ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Laryngomicrosurgery has some special characteristics. It is stressful due to intubation and direct laryngoscopy during a short operation time. Therefore both adequate anesthesia and quick recovery for the slience therapy after the operation are needed. This study compared the cardiovascular responses and recovery pattern between propofol and Thiopental-Enflurane anesthesia. METHODS: Sixty outpatients of ASA class 1 or 2 for microlaryngoscopy were randomly assigned to receive either anesthesia with propofol (Group P, n = 30) and thiopental-enflurane (Group E, n = 30). Group P was induced with propofol 2 mg/kg and succinylcholine 1 mg/kg and maintained with vecuronium 0.04 mg/kg, propofol 10 - 6 mg/kg/h, and N2:O2/3 L/min:2 L/min. Group E was induced with thiopental 5 mg/kg and succinylcholine 1 mg/kg and maintained with vecuronium 0.04 mg/kg, enflurane 1 3 vol%, and N2O:O2/3 L/min:2 L/min. Ketorolac (30 mg) and hydrocortisone (100 mg) were added for postoperative pain in both groups. The changes in blood pressure and heart rate, pre and post induction, were compared in both groups. In addition, we compared energence time and the state of recovery (Steward's score) 5 minutes and 15 minutes after extubation and the frequencies of other complications. RESULTS: No significant differences in age, wt, sex and anesthesia time of the two groups were observed. Mean arterial pressures were significantly different after anesthesia and after intubation between the two groups. However the heart rates were not different among the groups. The extubation time was significantly shorter in Group P. The recovery score at 5 min and 15 min after extubation was significantly higher in Group P. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that propofol with nitrous oxide may be useful in laryngeal microsurgery, especially, when silence therapy is needed.